Details
Category: EVENTS
Hits: 63

CP-Idaho is pleased to announce the upcoming 2020 Boise Debate between six (6) presidential primary candidates seeking the primary nomination of our state party.

 

What?  The 2020 Boise Debate!

Where?  Library! at Hillcrest, 5246 W. Overland Rd. Boise , ID 83705

When?  Saturday, February 29, 2020 starting 1:30 p.m. (Mountain) until about 4:00 p.m.

How?  A $10 donation at door, requested to defray costs in bringing this event to Idaho.

Why?  Boise Debate is the only forum of conservative constitutionalist presidential candidates.

 

Six (6) candidates are participating:

 

J.R. Myers of Montana, a licensed professional counselor

Don Grundmann of California, a doctor of chiropractic medicine

Dan Cummings of Utah, a medical doctor, family medicine and substance abuse

Don Blankenship of West Virginia, a corporate executive, mining

Sheila "Samm" Tittle of Virginia, a business woman

Charles Kraut of Virginia, a financial adviser

 

All six will have very different perspectives, and all six have qualifications of life, liberty, love of county and faith in God.  Come join us at Hillcrest!

 

Immediately following the debate, we will host a pizza dinner at the Hillcrest location of Idaho Pizza Company.  A cover charge of $20 to pay for the food and beverages and the restaurant wait staff is requested.

 

The pizza banquet will be an opportunity for Idahoans to meet our candidate directly, to follow up on debate questions, and get to know our representatives.  Come one, come all.

 

The Boise Debate will be real.  The questions will be tough.  The answers should be enlightening.  Be there! 

        

 

Details
Category: NEWS
Hits: 296

With the alleged Articles of Impeachment now before the Senate, the so-called "obstruction of Congress" charge will doubtlessly be summarily dismissed upon precedence.

"Obstruction of Congress" is the equivalent of "contempt". Cleverly disguised, perhaps, but semantically an equivalent term nevertheless.

However, Congress (specifically the hyper-partisan led House) lacks constitutional authority or even the general power to punish said "obstructive" contempt.

It would not be a surprise if the basis for dismissal of this specific "article" turns out to be the Supreme Court decision Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 (1880).

Kilbourn (brough in 1876, decided in 1880) involved Congress' attempts to coerce a witness upon the claim that "this power exists as one necessary to enable either House of Congress to exercise successfully their function."

Not so. The 1880 Supreme Court searched English common law for precedence (because absent clear case histories here, that is the proper legal source.) It found no support for the argument that Congress can coerce a witness.

‘‘We are of opinion that the right of the Houses of Representatives to punish the citizen for a contempt of its authority or a breach of its privileges can derive no support from the precedents and practices of the two Houses of the English Parliament, nor from the adjudged cases in which the English courts have upheld these practices." No support.

The 1880 court went further, saying: "Neither House of Congress was constituted a part of any court of general jurisdiction, nor has it any history to which the exercise of such power can be traced. Its power must be sought alone in some express grant in the Constitution, or be found necessary to carry into effect such powers as are there granted."

"Obstruction of Congress" (essentially they are claiming "a breach of privileges") will therefore probably be dismissed outright, under the Kilbourn decision.

The 1880 Court reiterated the inherent separation of powers between the federal departments, saying:

"The Constitution divides the power of the government which it establishes into the three departments -- the executive, the legislative, and the judicial -- and unlimited power is conferred on no department or officer of the government. It is essential to the successful working of the system that the lines which separate those departments shall be clearly defined and closely followed, and that neither of them shall be permitted to encroach upon the powers exclusively confided to the others."

"Neither of them shall be permitted to encroach". Thus, we suspect that Chief Justice Roberts presiding will so rule, citing the Kilbourn decision to this same effect. If so, you heard it here first

Details
Category: NEWS
Hits: 305

https://secure.piryx.com/donate/6KQx64Pw/Constitution-Party-of-Idaho/2020debate 

 

Ladies and gentlemen,

Your state party is working hard to bring to Idaho a high quality public forum in which citizen candidates have a fair opportunity to present their ideas and solutions for constitutionally oriented government.  Ticket donations help us accomplish this goal.

Seating for the 2020 Boise Debate will be limited to 100 General Admission seats.  Advance tickets help us plan for promotional printing (i.e. Debate Programs), and help us with equipment needs and various campaign assistance.  Please step up.

The piryx.com form has an entry blank for our contributors to write in an additional amount. All monies will go toward offsetting expenses associated with bring the 2020 Boise Debate to life! 

In addition, when details of finalized, we will have an "after the debate" Pizza Dinner With The Presidential Candidates.  We know of no other similar opportunity in Idaho for the public directly meet presidential candidates one on one.  Seating for the pizza meet and greet dinner will necessarily have to be limited (we anticipate 85 seats for the public). 

Again, we look forward to bringing this event to fruition, with your generous advanced ticket donations.  

  • You are here:  
  • Home